Selena Gomez is no stranger to the spotlight, but her latest appearance at an award show has sparked a lot of debate online. The singer wore a glamorous white gown, but not everyone was impressed by her choice. Some praised her for her stunning beauty, while others criticized her for looking too old.
A look inspired by Italian stars.
Selena Gomez ditched her usual sleek bun for a glamorous hairstyle that made her look like an Italian movie star. She wore a custom-made white Versace dress that sparkled with sequins and hugged her curves. Her hair was shiny and dark, with a deep side part and a bit of volume at the top. She let her long hair flow down her back, with some shorter pieces framing her face.
She matched her dress with a soft nude lip that enhanced her natural beauty. Her eyes were smoky and dramatic, with long lashes and a hint of shimmer. She also had red nails that added a pop of color to her look. She proved that you don’t need a tight bun to look classy, but you can also rock a loose and luxurious hairstyle.
Her dress got mixed reactions from people.
Selena Gomez’s dress was a white strappy gown with an empire waist and a long train. It showed off her glowing skin and her stunning figure. She was one of the highlights of the SAG Awards 2024, which took place on February 24, 2024, at the Shrine Auditorium & Expo Hall in Los Angeles. She was there to promote her show Only Murders in the Building, which was nominated for several awards. Some fans compared her look to Marilyn Monroe.
However, not everyone was a fan of her look. Some people online were not impressed by her choice of dress and her appearance. They said she looked too old, or too boring. One Instagram user even said she looked 65.
This was not the first time Selena Gomez faced negative comments about her looks. Another dress choice of hers causes quite a stir on the internet.
Barbra Streisand Defends District Attorney Fani Willis: “A Woman Can Have a Private Life”
Conservative critics have been criticizing Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, and Barbra Streisand has lately come out in favor of her. Streisand is adamant that the critiques of Willis are an unjustified attempt to damage her reputation by intruding into her private affairs.
Streisand outlined in a post on X how Willis is being unfairly scrutinized for her personal connection to Nathan Wade, a deputy attorney she employed to look into the Georgia 2020 election results. Streisand emphasized the unfair disparities that exist, posing the question of why it is acceptable for males to lead private lives yet women are subjected to harsh criticism for doing the same.
“How absurd it is for the Republicans to want to fire Fani Willis. For what purpose? Believing that a woman cannot lead a private life in addition to a career? Men engage in it frequently! How absurd is this situation? Streisand said.
Not content to stop there, Streisand also used the occasion to attack former President Trump and his allies. She emphasized that the attacks on Willis are a ploy to divert attention away from the most important details of the case, which include Trump’s purported attempt to exert pressure on the Secretary of State to rig the vote tallies in his favor and submit fictitious electors to Congress.
This ongoing dispute highlights the larger discussion of how personal and professional lives overlap, particularly when it comes to high-stakes legal and political disputes. It raises important concerns about gender equality and the particular demands made on women in leadership roles.
Barbra Streisand’s support of Fani Willis highlights the particular difficulties women have in juggling their personal and professional obligations. It serves as a heartbreaking reminder that women’s decisions to retain a private life in addition to their work obligations should not be scrutinized or judged.
In conclusion, Streisand’s remarks highlight the significance of treating all people fairly in the workplace, regardless of gender. Like men, women should be allowed to lead their lives without being subjected to unwarranted criticism. It’s a request that everyone acknowledge and deal with these prejudices in order to establish a more equal and encouraging work environment for everyone.
Leave a Reply